Talent Management Framework for Social and Community Development Organizations

Abstract

Background: Talent Management Framework for Social and Community Development Organizations has practical relevance for communityfacing organizations because visible activity does not necessarily translate into durable organizational or stakeholder outcomes. In social and community development organizations, managers must coordinate roles, workloads, skills, performance expectations, career opportunities, leadership routines, and employee voice while responding to expectations from employees, supervisors, managers, volunteers, and partner organizations. A program may expand reach or participation and still underperform when responsibilities are unclear, information is fragmented, or symbolic participation. Aims: This article develops a capability-based framework explaining how talent management framework may contribute to capability, engagement, and commitment. It distinguishes simple activity from coordinated capability and identifies boundary conditions that can weaken otherwise positive relationships. Research Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review of established literature relevant to the focal domain, organizational capabilities, stakeholder relationships, and learning. It does not claim primary survey, interview, experimental, or transaction data. Results and Conclusion: The synthesis identifies four mutually dependent mechanisms: role and expectation clarity, capability through practice, supportive leadership and voice, and recognition and continuity. Their value depends on transparent governance, usable information, proportionate participation requirements, and a review process that converts exceptions into improvement. The article argues that higher activity alone is an inadequate indicator of success because benefits can coexist with hidden workload, exclusion, dependency, or weakened trust. Contribution: The article contributes a diagnostic framework, linked performance indicators, six propositions for empirical testing, and a fivestage implementation pathway that can be used in resource-constrained community organizations.