Community-Centered Innovation Management for Sustainable Local Growth
Keywords:
communityAbstract
Background: Community-Centered Innovation Management for Sustainable Local Growth has practical relevance for community-facing organizations because visible activity does not necessarily translate into durable organizational or stakeholder outcomes. In sustainable local growth, managers must coordinate local needs, participation rules, service arrangements, resources, information, and follow-up commitments while responding to expectations from community organizations, local enterprises, residents, managers, and public or educational partners. A program may expand reach or participation and still underperform when responsibilities are unclear, information is fragmented, or unequal access. Aims: This article develops a capability-based framework explaining how community-centered innovation management may contribute to innovation quality, learning speed, and adaptability. It distinguishes simple activity from coordinated capability and identifies boundary conditions that can weaken otherwise positive relationships. Research Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review of established literature relevant to the focal domain, organizational capabilities, stakeholder relationships, and learning. It does not claim primary survey, interview, experimental, or transaction data. Results and Conclusion: The synthesis identifies four mutually dependent mechanisms: needs and problem clarity, inclusive participation, capability and resource alignment, and feedback and institutional learning. Their value depends on transparent governance, usable information, proportionate participation requirements, and a review process that converts exceptions into improvement. The article argues that higher activity alone is an inadequate indicator of success because benefits can coexist with hidden workload, exclusion, dependency, or weakened trust. Contribution: The article contributes a diagnostic framework, linked performance indicators, six propositions for empirical testing, and a fivestage implementation pathway that can be used in resource-constrained community organizations.
Downloads
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. MIT Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
Gronroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36-44.
International Co-operative Alliance. (2015). Guidance Notes to the Co-operative Principles. International Co-operative Alliance.
International Labour Office. (2013). Resilience in a Downturn: The Power of Financial Cooperatives. International Labour Office.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-116.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363-382.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
World Bank. (2022). The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Farida Yulianty, Sri Rochani Mulyani (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









