Digital Communication Strategy for Strengthening Community Institutional Trust
Keywords:
digital communication, digital, community development, trustAbstract
Background: Digital Communication Strategy for Strengthening Community Institutional Trust has practical relevance for community-facing organizations because visible activity does not necessarily translate into durable organizational or stakeholder outcomes. In strengthening community institutional trust, managers must coordinate digital workflows, data definitions, user access, platform rules, support processes, and security controls while responding to expectations from users, staff, managers, technology partners, and community organizations. A program may expand reach or participation and still underperform when responsibilities are unclear, information is fragmented, or exclusion of lowreadiness users. Aims: This article develops a capability-based framework explaining how digital communication strategy may contribute to trust, credibility, and relationship stability. It distinguishes simple activity from coordinated capability and identifies boundary conditions that can weaken otherwise positive relationships. Research Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review of established literature relevant to the focal domain, organizational capabilities, stakeholder relationships, and learning. It does not claim primary survey, interview, experimental, or transaction data. Results and Conclusion: The synthesis identifies four mutually dependent mechanisms: readiness and problem fit, process and data integration, assisted adoption and inclusion, and learning and governance. Their value depends on transparent governance, usable information, proportionate participation requirements, and a review process that converts exceptions into improvement. The article argues that higher activity alone is an inadequate indicator of success because benefits can coexist with hidden workload, exclusion, dependency, or weakened trust. Contribution: The article contributes a diagnostic framework, linked performance indicators, six propositions for empirical testing, and a fivestage implementation pathway that can be used in resource-constrained community organizations.
Downloads
References
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity. Free Press.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1992). Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. MIT Press.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson.
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69- 96.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20-38.
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A., & Song, M. (2017). Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 223-238.
Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-116.
OECD. (2021). The Digital Transformation of SMEs. OECD Publishing.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.
Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363-382.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144.
Warner, K. S. R., & Wager, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326-349.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Endang Ruchiyat, Anggun Yolistina (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


