Sustainable Supply Chain Practices Among Community-Linked Cooperatives

Authors

  • Nyoman Dwika Ayu Amrita Universitas Ngurah Rai, Indonesia Author
  • Faisal Matriadi Universitas Malikussaleh, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

supply, community development, network reliability

Abstract

Background: Sustainable Supply Chain Practices Among Community-Linked Cooperatives has practical relevance for community-facing organizations because visible activity does not necessarily translate into durable organizational or stakeholder outcomes. In community-linked cooperatives, managers must coordinate demand information, product standards, inventory, delivery schedules, payment terms, exceptions, and supplier development while responding to expectations from local producers, buyers, logistics providers, cooperative managers, and service partners. A program may expand reach or participation and still underperform when responsibilities are unclear, information is fragmented, or single-partner dependency. Aims: This article develops a capability-based framework explaining how sustainable supply chain practices may contribute to network reliability, producer participation, and availability. It distinguishes simple activity from coordinated capability and identifies boundary conditions that can weaken otherwise positive relationships. Research Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review of established literature relevant to the focal domain, organizational capabilities, stakeholder relationships, and learning. It does not claim primary survey, interview, experimental, or transaction data. Results and Conclusion: The synthesis identifies four mutually dependent mechanisms: shared demand visibility, joint operating standards, coordinated fulfillment, and relational governance and learning. Their value depends on transparent governance, usable information, proportionate participation requirements, and a review process that converts exceptions into improvement. The article argues that higher activity alone is an inadequate indicator of success because benefits can coexist with hidden workload, exclusion, dependency, or weakened trust. Contribution: The article contributes a diagnostic framework, linked performance indicators, six propositions for empirical testing, and a fivestage implementation pathway that can be used in resource-constrained community organizations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 163-180.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. MIT Press.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.

International Co-operative Alliance. (2015). Guidance Notes to the Co-operative Principles. International Co-operative Alliance.

International Labour Office. (2013). Resilience in a Downturn: The Power of Financial Cooperatives. International Labour Office.

Ivanov, D. (2020). Predicting the impacts of epidemic outbreaks on global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the coronavirus outbreak. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 136, 101922.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.

Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80-116.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press.

Scholten, K., & Schilder, S. (2015). The role of collaboration in supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 471-484.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.

Sheffi, Y. (2005). The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage. MIT Press.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.

Wieland, A., & Wallenburg, C. M. (2013). The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: A relational view. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(4), 300-320.

World Bank. (2022). The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

Sustainable Supply Chain Practices Among Community-Linked Cooperatives. (2026). KRIEZ ACADEMY: Journal of Development and Community Service, 3(03). https://kriezacademy.com/index.php/kriezacademy/article/view/113