Strategic Communication of ESG Practices to Local Stakeholders
Keywords:
esg, sustainability, community development, credibilityAbstract
Background: Strategic Communication of ESG Practices to Local Stakeholders has practical relevance for community-facing organizations because visible activity does not necessarily translate into durable organizational or stakeholder outcomes. In esg practices to local stakeholders, managers must coordinate environmental and social impacts, claims, commitments, material topics, stakeholder feedback, and corrective action while responding to expectations from organizations, local communities, employees, suppliers, regulators, and civil-society groups. A program may expand reach or participation and still underperform when responsibilities are unclear, information is fragmented, or claims that exceed operational performance. Aims: This article develops a capability-based framework explaining how strategic communication may contribute to credibility, environmental awareness, and stakeholder trust. It distinguishes simple activity from coordinated capability and identifies boundary conditions that can weaken otherwise positive relationships. Research Method: The paper uses an integrative conceptual review of established literature relevant to the focal domain, organizational capabilities, stakeholder relationships, and learning. It does not claim primary survey, interview, experimental, or transaction data. Results and Conclusion: The synthesis identifies four mutually dependent mechanisms: impact and claim relevance, evidence and transparency, stakeholder dialogue, and follow-through and learning. Their value depends on transparent governance, usable information, proportionate participation requirements, and a review process that converts exceptions into improvement. The article argues that higher activity alone is an inadequate indicator of success because benefits can coexist with hidden workload, exclusion, dependency, or weakened trust. Contribution: The article contributes a diagnostic framework, linked performance indicators, six propositions for empirical testing, and a fivestage implementation pathway that can be used in resource-constrained community organizations.
Downloads
References
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and do not know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone.
Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). Consolidated Set of the GRI Standards 2021. Global Reporting Initiative.
Gronroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36-44.
International Co-operative Alliance. (2015). Guidance Notes to the Co-operative Principles. International Co-operative Alliance.
International Labour Office. (2013). Resilience in a Downturn: The Power of Financial Cooperatives. International Labour Office.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71-79.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing Management (15th ed.). Pearson.
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69- 96.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(Special Issue), 33-44.
Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363-382.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
World Bank. (2022). The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ijang Faisal, Nida Garnida Fitrianti (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


